Accidental Landlord? What to Know Before You Let Short-Term

 

We’ve all done it – slipped and somehow landed in a buy-to-let we’re now responsible for, except no we absolutely haven’t, so what exactly do we mean by an ‘accidental landlord’, and how does one find themselves in this position?

It’s actually more common than you might think to become a landlord without ever planning to. What makes it ‘accidental’ is when it happens through unforeseen circumstances rather than as part of a pre-planned investment strategy. Inheriting a house, relocating suddenly, merging households, or facing slow selling timelines are just a few of the situations that can lead to this complex – albeit rather fortunate – predicament.

This rise in platforms such as Airbnb and Booking.com portrays short-term letting agreements as easy, accessible, and casual, but in today’s rapidly changing legislative landscape, it can be far from that. It’s essential, therefore, to understand the rules and ensure proper compliance before jumping into a quick fix, and professional advice like that of Glaisyers ETL could make this much easier. This guide explains the rules and strategic steps to make letting lawful and low-stress.

Understanding Short- and Medium-Term Lets

Short-term lets are usually defined as those lasting up to six months and tend to be the ones you’d book on an app – think weekends away, work trips, and other casual agreements. Medium-term lets, ranging from six months to one year, are ideal for individuals needing temporary housing for a specific period. For anything longer than a year, the arrangement usually falls under a long-term let, often covered by an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST).

Existing to protect both the tenant and the landlord, an AST outlines the terms for someone to live in a property. Common elements of the AST include; the start and end date of the fixed-term agreement, the amount of rent to pay and how regularly it must be paid, the address of the rented property, when and how the rent is reviewed, the bills which the tenant is responsible for, the deposit amount and occasions in which it can be withheld, and the names and addresses of all parties. Landlords might also wish to include details of break clauses, property rules (e.g. No parties, unless you invite me), and their own legal responsibilities.

Regional Rules and Restrictions

While this is the way things typically go in England, rules vary depending on location. Scotland operates under a different system using Private Residential Tenancies (PRTs), while London has additional restrictions on short-term letting.

London’s 90-day Limit

If you’re letting a whole home, you’re usually limited to 90 nights a year unless you get planning permission to do more. That 90-night cap is there to stop houses disappearing from the long-term rental market, and it applies regardless of which platform you list on. If you want to let for longer, you’ll need to check local planning rules and apply for the right permission.

Scotland’s Mandatory Licensing for Short-Term Lets

Scotland have introduced a national licensing regime for short-term lets. If you host there, you’ll need to prove the property meets health and safety standards and pass a fit-and-proper-person test for the licence holder or operator.

England and Wales

England and, to a lesser degree, Wales, may be following Scotland’s suit in moving towards a national registration system for short-term lets. Alongside planning changes, this would create a new use class specifically for short-term letting. Hosts may soon have to register their properties, and there will be clearer rules about when a property’s use counts as a short-term let rather than a home.

Know Your Due Diligence 

 In welcoming someone into a property you own, you accept responsibility for a guest’s safety, and there are clear guidelines you must follow in order to carry out your due diligence.  

 

Gas safety: Annual gas safety checks are required under the Gas Safety Regulations 1998. That means every gas appliance needs a professional inspection every year, and you must keep records for at least two years. Electrical safety: Electrical safety tests and portable appliance tests are important factors to consider. Alarms: Landlords are responsible for installing smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors, as well as checking they work at the start of each tenancy.  Fire and water risks: Many short-term lets are treated as non-domestic premises, which means fire risk assessments are required, along with adherence to furniture fire safety rules. Don’t forget about legionella either – a legionella risk assessment helps manage water-borne bacteria in taps, showers, and hot water systems. This is especially important if your property has been dormant for a while. Insurance: Standard home insurance might not cover short-term letting, so make sure you have a policy designed for holiday lets or commercial use. EPC: Most properties will also need an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC). Deposit Scheme: You don’t have to take a deposit, but if you do, you must legally comply with the relevant tenancy deposit legislation. 

Keeping Thorough Records 

From 6 April 2025, income and gains from former Furnished Holiday Let (FHL) Properties will be treated as ordinary property businesses. The abolition of this regime has knock-on effects for things like capital allowances, mortgage interest relief, and capital gains tax, so it’s worth understanding how it impacts your finances and preparing for these changes. 

As a landlord, you should keep detailed records of rent payments, correspondence with tenants, safety certificates, repairs, expenses and insurance documents.  

With this in mind, if there is a need to evidence anything (whether property or accountancy related), having clear records will make it much easier to defend your actions. 

Where Glaisyers ETL Can Help 

Navigating the legal side of being a landlord can feel overwhelming, especially when it wasn’t part of your original plan. If you’ve accidentally stumbled into the world of letting and aren’t quite sure what rules apply to you, don’t panic; you’re far from the only one.  

Glaisyers ETL can assist you in providing an overview of potential risk factors when considering your landlord obligations, either from a commercial and/or residential viewpoint.

Updating Your Settlement Agreement Templates for 2025 Legal Changes

 

Driven by this year’s changes brought about by the Employment Rights Bill, the landscape for settlement agreements is shifting as forthcoming updates could mean that precedent agreements used as recently as last year could need to be amended to avoid exposing businesses to risk. With help from trusted professionals at Glaisyers ETL, you can ensure that your settlement agreement precedent is fully compliant. For HR managers and business owners having a basic understanding of the legal principles underpinning settlement agreements is critical to protecting the businesses’ reputation, maintaining employee relationships and most importantly, mitigating the risk of legal claims. 

What are the Key Changes?

When the new Employment Rights Bill comes into force, Non Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) used by employers against workers will be void if they are attempting to prevent the worker from making allegations or a disclosure of information relating to discrimination or harassment.  This will include NDAs in settlement agreements. It is therefore important that business owners and HR teams make sure that their precedent Settlement Agreements are up to date.  

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Even with correct precedent documents, businesses frequently encounter avoidable mistakes. Ambiguous language and unclear terms, or clauses that conflict with statutory rights are common triggers for disputes. Generic, blanket waivers can be problematic if they don’t properly cover all of the claims relevant to a specific employee which need to be waived. HR teams should also be mindful to give employees proper time to consider the terms of a settlement agreement so not to be seen as placing employees under undue pressure. They should also ensure that the employee has taken proper legal advice on the terms and effect of entering into the settlement agreement as both these factors can affect the legitimacy of the agreement. 

Practical Guidance for Employers

Updating settlement agreements is not just a compliance exercise, it is a tool to minimise the businesses’ exposure to the risk of claims. Here are some simple steps you can take to start your company’s review process. 

Step One: Audit your existing templates for outdated clauses. 

Step Two: Identify any generic language that could create ambiguity. 

Step Three: Review confidentiality clauses in line with the Employment Rights Bill changes.  

Step Four: Contact an employment lawyer at Glaisyers ETL to provide bespoke advice. 

By reviewing and updating templates for 2025, employers can reduce their exposure to legal claims, protect their organisation’s reputation, and demonstrate a commitment to fair and careful practices.  

Need a Hand?

Schedule a consultation with a member of our team at Glaisyers ETL to ensure your settlement agreement templates are fully compliant, or get help drafting a new one if they’re out of date.

Glaisyers Solicitors: Leading Legal Expertise in Manchester & Liverpool

 

From advising business owners on major transactions, to guiding families through sensitive, personal matters, Glaisyers ETL combines technical excellence with approachable service. For decades, we’ve supported high-net-worth individuals, entrepreneurs, and major organisations with clear, practical advice. Whatever the scale, clients know they can rely on us for care and expertise.

Proudly Rooted in the Northwest

Embedded in the rich cultural hubs of Manchester and Liverpool, Glaisyers ETL offers unparalleled accessibility and a deep knowledge of the regional business landscape – we’re part of each city’s heartbeat. In Manchester, our relocation to Spinningfields places us right in the centre of the legal, financial, and business district, where deals happen, decisions are made, and connections count. In Liverpool, our strategic merger with Quinn Barrow Solicitors strengthened our connection to local enterprises, property developers, and professional networks in the region. We know who’s who, what’s happening locally, and how to make things move smoothly. 

We work with everyone from ambitious entrepreneurs and corporate leaders to families who just want peace of mind when it comes to their future. By building strong ties with networks and integrating ourselves into the local communities, we’ve become more than a law firm; we’re a trusted ally. 

Every Angle Covered

As a full-service law firm, we take care of the key areas you’re most likely to need, all under one roof: 

Commercial Litigation: Cutting through complex, high-value disputes.
Corporate and Commercial: Helping businesses grow, merge, or restructure.
Employment: Pragmatic advice that works for both employers and employees.
Private Client: Wills, trusts, estate planning – protecting what matters most.
Real Estate: Supporting development, investment, and transactions.
Family Law: Handling divorce, child arrangements, and financial matters with care.
Creative, Digital and Marketing: Commercial, intellectual property and digital solutions for fast moving sectors – protecting the rights of creatives. 

The Recognition That Matters

Glaisyers ETL is proud to have once again retained its rankings across several key practice areas in the Northwest, including…

Corporate and Commercial (Manchester) – Tier 4
Commercial Litigation (Manchester) – Tier 3
Commercial Litigation (Liverpool) – Tier 4
Employment (Manchester) – Tier 5
Private Client (Manchester) – Tier 3
Commercial Property (Manchester) – Tier 5
Media and Entertainment – Tier 3 

While we’re thrilled to gain regular recognition in leading legal directories and be shortlisted for top industry awards, what matters to us most is the feedback we receive from our clients. Glaisyers ETL has become synonymous with reliability, professionalism, and expertise amongst the business landscape of the Northwest. 

 

“The property team at Glaisyers acted for me in a rather complicated property purchase.” Says one client. “I am myself a practicing lawyer – the worst type of client for another lawyer – but they kept me properly informed and advised and empowered me with the information I needed to take the necessary decisions. The result: a glorious little cottage, and a very satisfied customer.” 

Giving Back to the Community

We’re big believers in supporting the places we live and work. We sponsor local initiatives to make sure our skills and resources have a positive impact, even beyond our client base. Our focus is always on practical, tailored advice that helps you reach your goals, for today and for the future. That’s why so many clients choose to stick with us for the journey, not just the quick fix. 

Our recent, longstanding support for Francis House (based in Didsbury) demonstrates our care for care for the real people and communities in Greater Manchester.

“Supporting Francis House through this partnership allows us to make a meaningful difference to families facing incredibly difficult circumstances.” Explains Chris Burrows, the Head of Private Client Services at Glaisyers. “By offering our expertise, we hope to encourage more people to consider making or updating their Will while also helping to secure the future of such an essential charity.”

Give us a Call

For those seeking high-end legal advice delivered with professionalism and care, Glaisyers ETL is the partner of choice in Manchester and Liverpool. Our breadth of expertise, track record of success, and commitment to community involvement sets us apart as a leader in the legal market. Whether you’re eyeing up a business acquisition, dealing with a sensitive family issue, or spotting the first signs of a dispute, having us in your corner early can save a lot of stress (and cost) later on. 

Partner with Glaisyers ETL for trusted legal expertise across the Northwest.

Getty Images v Stability AI – the UK judgment in practical terms

Getty Images v Stability AI – the UK judgment in practical terms

 

On 4 November 2025, the High Court handed down Getty Images v Stability AI [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch). It didn’t answer the headline question – whether UK law requires permission to use copyrighted works for model training – because Getty’s primary UK “training” claims were abandoned once it became clear the relevant training wasn’t shown to occur in the UK. Copyright is territorial: no UK act, no UK copyright claim. 

Getty’s back-up theory also failed. The Court rejected the idea that Stable Diffusion is itself an “infringing copy” under ss.22–23 CDPA. In plain English: if the model doesn’t store or reproduce the underlying works, simply having or supplying the model in the UK isn’t secondary infringement. 

Trademarks were the only real win for Getty, and even then, the infringement was narrow and historic. The Court found infringement where older models produced images with watermark artefacts (e.g., the GETTY logo). For newer models, there wasn’t evidence that UK users were responsible for those infringements, so those claims failed. The s.10(3) “reputation” route went nowhere, and passing off added nothing useful. 

What it means in practice  

For developers (model builders and platforms): 

Primary risk sits in outputs. If your system emits logos/watermarks, expect trademark pain.  

Data provenance must be designed into the product. Keep a source registry and licence ledger for any commercial training/fine-tuning. Tag checkpoints with data lineage. 

Be audit-ready. Log prompts/outputs, model/version and filters applied. Ship model cards and release notes showing brand-artefact testing. 

Design for policy drift. Build switches for opt-outs and fast migration to licensed corpora. Tomorrow’s rules should be a config change, not a rewrite. 

For deployers (brands, agencies and enterprises using AI tools) 

Focus on what the public sees. Your immediate exposure is messy outputs (logos, watermarks, confusing lookalikes). Keep a human review gate for public assets. 

Buy on evidence, not hype. Choose vendors who can demonstrate where training took place, what was included, and how brand safety is tested. Ask for logs, model cards and a provenance ledger. 

Contract for hygiene. Require watermark/logo suppression, prompt/output logging, speedy takedown, disclosure of training geography, and warranties of lawful access with sensible indemnities. 

Document the why. DPIA + short “training map” on file; keep proof of licences/lawful access for any fine-tuning you commission. 

Rehearse the fix. If something slips through, be able to pull the asset, trace the prompt/version, notify stakeholders, and ship a clean replacement the same day.   

In the UK, immediate AI risk clusters around three things: outputs (avoid logos/watermarks and lookalike branding), territoriality (where training actually occurred), and provenance (be able to show lawful access/licences). The core “permission to train” question remains undecided in UK law, and UK GDPR still applies whenever personal data is involved. 

Contact Us

For professional assistance in implementing these controls and contractual protections, feel free to contact the Creative, Digital and Marketing team.

Trainee Solicitor

Kieran Barrow

Companies House Identity Verification

Companies House Identity Verification

 

Since 18 November, all UK company directors, Persons with Significant Control (PSCs), and all members of Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), are legally required to complete the Companies House identity verification process. This forms a central part of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) – a legislation designed to strengthen corporate governance, enhance transparency, and prevent companies from being used for illegal purposes. 

Failure to comply may lead to fines, delays, and reputational damage, making it vital for organisations – particularly those with complex ownership structures – to act now. Existing directors will have until the company’s next confirmation statement is due to fulfil these obligations, and those with multiple founders, directors, investors, or PSCs will face a more intricate process. 

Why Identity Verification is Being Introduced 

The reforms aim to modernise and secure the UK’s corporate registry system. Mandatory verification will: 

1.  Enhance transparency and improve data integrity: ensuring that individuals setting up, running, or controlling companies are accurately identified, strengthening the reliability of the Companies House register.

2. Prevent fraud and illegal activity: helping identify those attempting to use companies for fraud, money laundering, or other criminal purposes.

3. Support Anti-Money Laundering compliance: giving businesses greater confidence that the companies and individuals they interact with are genuine.

4. Facilitate digital transformation: providing a streamlined, secure identity verification system makes compliance more efficient and accessible.

5. Enable a linked-individuals account: directors, PSCs, and LLP members can link all their companies to a single account, so identity verification only needs to be completed once, regardless of how many entities they are involved in.

Who Must Comply?

Company Directors
Persons of Significant
Control (PSCs)
All members of Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)
Third-party agents acting on behalf of companies
Both new and existing companies.

How to Complete Identity Verification

Companies House will offer two verification routes:

Digital Verification

This involves:

Creating a Government One Login and Companies House account
Uploading approved identification (e.g., passport or driving licence)
Taking a live facial photo
Automatic verification via secure authentication technology

The Post Office will also support aspects of this process under a government contract.

Verification Through an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP)

An ACSP can perform verification on your behalf. These are regulated firms approved by Companies House to conduct identity checks.

Glaisyers ETL will act as ACSPs, enabling directors, PSCs, and LLP members to complete verification easily, which can be especially beneficial when:

You lack access to a smartphone
The digital service cannot verify you
Your organisation has multiple directors or PSCs requiring coordinated identity checks

Existing clients can be verified quickly, as identity documents may already be held on file.

The Administrative Impact on Companies

While essential, the new requirements may bring complexity, particularly for organisations with layered or international ownership structures. Companies must:

Maintain accurate corporate records
Ensure that reporting obligations are fully up to date
Confirm that each director and PSC understands their responsibilities and completes verification on time

Glaisyers offers end-to-end management of the verification process. They ensure all corporate records are correct, provide governance advice, and streamline reporting obligations, making compliance straightforward and stress-free. Mandatory identity verification marks a major step toward greater corporate transparency, reduced fraud risk, and improved data accuracy. To avoid penalties, companies should act now.

Stay ahead of the curve and book a discovery call with Glaisyers today to ensure your agency is fully compliant.

Solicitor

Ryan Baratzi

AI in Creative, Digital and Business Contracts

AI in Creative, Digital and Business Contracts

 

AI now sits at the heart of how modern businesses operate. It drafts documents, designs visuals, analyses data, forecasts sales, and writes marketing copy before you’ve finished your coffee. But for all its productivity gains, it also brings a new breed of contractual risk. 

 

When an AI tool produces something infringing, biased, or just plain wrong, the familiar questions arrive: who owns it, who’s liable, and who pays the bill when it goes public? 

 

Traditional contracts – written long before the era of prompts and models – often can’t keep up. 

 

Know Who The “Author” is Before the AI Does 

Under section 9(3) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the “author” of a computer-generated work is the person who arranges its creation. Logical enough, though drafted at a time when the cleverest thing a computer did was play solitaire. 

 

In today’s landscape, “arrangements” can mean anything from prompting and training to integrating AI into workflows. That could involve internal teams, third-party developers, SaaS providers, or external partners. To stay ahead:

Spell out who owns the AI outputs and who can adapt, license, or monetise them. 

Deal with moral rights early. Will they be waived, shared, or retained? 

Address joint ownership when several contributors shape the input or model. 

Read the fine print. Many AI platforms limit commercial use, require attribution, or change their licence terms faster than a patch update. Ignoring that can turn into a copyright claim overnight. 

Consider adding a clause to address model drift when an AI vendor retrains its model and your previously safe outputs start resembling someone else’s IP. 

 

For businesses co-developing AI systems or datasets with partners, Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) should clarify ownership, licensing, and commercialisation rights before any code or content is created. 

 

Managing Brand and Reputational Risks 

AI can supercharge performance or damage reputations. Whether it’s a chatbot with attitude, an AI that fabricates customer data, or an automated design tool that borrows too much “inspiration”, brand damage can be swift. 

 

Regulators have made it clear that automation does not dilute accountability. If an AI system misleads consumers, publishes false information, or mishandles data, the business deploying it remains responsible. 

 

Contracts should therefore:

Require human review of AI outputs before publication or implementation. 

Include brand-protection clauses and indemnities for reputational harm. 

Set out crisis-management obligations: who acts, who apologises, who fixes it. 

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and CAP Code continue to apply across industries. Misleading AI-generated materials, from social posts to automated product recommendations, can breach advertising and consumer protection law regardless of intent. 

 

Transparency: The New Differentiator

AI-driven operations rely on vast datasets. With the UK GDPR and the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (DUAA), which governs AI-driven data sharing and model transparency, tightening controls, businesses can’t hide behind “the algorithm did it.” 

 

Articles 13–15 and 22 of the GDPR still apply, demanding transparency whenever personal data drives automated decision-making. The ICO’s 2025 AI Guidance underscores key principles: document your logic, minimise your data, and keep a human in the loop.

 

Contracts should require that:

Vendors comply with current ICO AI Guidance. 

Data minimisation, pseudonymisation, and deletion protocols are implemented. 

Special category data is excluded from AI profiling unless strictly necessary. 

Humans review all automated outputs with material impact.  

Beyond compliance, transparency is now a selling point. Customers, investors, and regulators increasingly prefer companies that can explain how their AI works and why it’s fair. 

 

Future-Proofing AI Contracts 

The biggest contracting mistake is treating the agreement as static. AI evolves monthly, not annually, and your paperwork should keep pace.

 

Build in: 

Annual AI risk and compliance reviews. 

Automatic reassessment when vendors retrain or replace models. 

Internal governance connecting legal, technical, and data teams. 

You wouldn’t let a financial forecast go unreviewed for a year, so don’t let your AI contracts gather dust. 

 

The CMA’s 2024 Foundation Models Report also urges companies to monitor supplier transparency and competition risks in AI procurement. It’s another reason to keep clauses flexible and forward-looking. 

 

The Bottom Line 

AI has redrawn the commercial landscape. To keep innovation lawful, ethical, and profitable, contracts must evolve in step. The savviest businesses aren’t just using AI; they’re contracting for it – allocating ownership, defining liability, protecting data, and planning exits before the system misbehaves. 

 

At Glaisyers ETL, our Creative, Digital & Marketing team works with businesses across sectors, from tech start-ups to global brands, to future-proof their contracts and manage AI-driven risk. We help ensure your innovation stays bold, compliant, and commercially sound. 

 

Because in the age of AI, the most innovative strategy is still a well-drafted clause.

Trainee Solicitor

Kieran Barrow